5 min read 29 May 20262026-27

What I Wish Someone Had Told Me in Year 1 of Running a UK Limited Company

From the compliance burden no one mentions upfront, to the salary vs dividend mistake that quietly costs directors thousands — a first-person account of what actually matters when you go limited.

Reviewed by D. Cann · Principal, Apex Assets Group
Bottom line: Going limited isn't automatically the right move — especially in Year 1. And even when the structure does make sense, the single most expensive mistake most solo directors make isn't dramatic. It's just quietly taking salary at the wrong level.

I've operated as a limited company director in the UK. And the thing I most wish I'd understood from the start isn't complicated — it's just rarely stated plainly.

When your revenue is low, or you're in the early stages of building a business, operating through a limited company structure may actually be working against you.

The compliance burden nobody mentions upfront

The pitch for going limited is familiar: tax efficiency, liability protection, professional credibility. All of that is real. But what often gets glossed over in early conversations is the administrative and compliance load that comes with it.

Financial statement submissions. Corporation tax returns. Confirmation statements. Director's loan account monitoring. The obligation to maintain accurate records not just for tax purposes but for Companies House. If you're not turning over meaningful revenue, the accountancy fees and administrative overhead of maintaining that structure can exceed the tax savings it generates.

This isn't an argument against limited companies — it's an argument for being clear-eyed about the threshold at which the structure starts paying for itself. For some sole traders, remaining outside a corporate structure in the early years is the more efficient decision. That's rarely the first thing an accountant tells you when you're enthusiastic about starting a new business.

The most expensive quiet mistake I've seen solo directors make

It's not dramatic. There's no HMRC investigation, no penalty notice, no fraud. It's this: taking salary at a level that isn't tax-optimised, when that same money drawn as a dividend would have been taxed more efficiently.

Most directors know vaguely that dividends are "better" than salary for tax purposes. Fewer understand the exact calculation — what the optimal salary level is, what dividend allowance is available, how those interact with income tax bands, and how the employer NI secondary threshold affects the arithmetic.

The April 2025 changes made this more pressing. The secondary threshold dropped to £5,000, which means employer NI kicks in on salary much earlier than it did previously. For a single director company — particularly one that isn't eligible for the Employment Allowance — the right salary level calculation has shifted.

My working position now: keeping salary at around £12,750 is the most efficient structure given the current rules, but this is personal-circumstances dependent and worth reviewing with every tax year change.

What accountants often miss when advising solo directors

The best accountants think about a director's personal financial picture, not just the company's. Many don't.

Here's a concrete example: a solo director optimising purely for tax efficiency might minimise their visible earned income — keeping salary low, drawing dividends. That's often correct from a pure tax standpoint. But it can create significant problems when that director then needs to demonstrate income for a mortgage application, a finance product, or any kind of lending assessment.

Mortgage lenders look at salary and sometimes dividends differently, depending on the lender. A director with a minimal salary and large dividend may find themselves poorly positioned for lending even while their business is genuinely profitable. If your accountant isn't asking about your personal financial goals — not just the company's tax bill — that's a gap worth addressing.

The salary vs. dividend question after April 2025

The April 2025 employer NI changes created a specific recalculation for one-person limited companies. With the secondary threshold now at £5,000, any salary above that level attracts employer NI at 15% — and for director-only companies without access to the Employment Allowance, there's no buffer.

The practical outcome is that the optimal salary point has moved. The calculation needs to balance: staying within the personal allowance to avoid income tax, building a qualifying NI year (which requires salary above the Lower Earnings Limit), and minimising employer NI exposure.

Running that calculation manually is error-prone. Running it once and not revisiting it when thresholds change is equally risky. That's precisely what the calculators on this site are for — they reflect the current 2026/27 figures and show you the full picture.

This site covers director tax strategy from the perspective of someone who has operated a UK limited company and works with the current HMRC rules. Nothing here is formal financial advice — for your personal position, use a qualified accountant. But the calculations should help you go into that conversation informed.

Desh Naidoo-Cann

Written by Desh Naidoo-Cann · Founder, Apex Assets Group · MBA Finance

Frequently asked questions

At what revenue level does going limited start making sense?
There's no universal threshold, but a common rule of thumb is £30,000–£40,000 in annual profit. Below that, the accountancy fees and compliance overhead often outweigh the tax savings compared to operating as a sole trader. The calculation shifts significantly once you factor in your ability to draw dividends instead of salary.
Is £12,750 always the optimal director salary?
Not always — it depends on your profit level, whether you have other income, and your personal financial goals. £12,750 is a common starting point for 2026/27 because it sits just above the personal allowance and builds a qualifying NI year, but directors in the marginal corporation tax band (£50,001–£250,000 profit) may have different optimal points.
Why would a low salary hurt a mortgage application?
Most mortgage lenders assess affordability based on verifiable income. For directors, this typically means salary plus dividends shown on two to three years of accounts and tax returns. A minimal salary with large dividends can look inconsistent to lenders, and some high-street banks weight salary more heavily than dividends. Specialist contractor and director mortgages exist, but they often require a broker.

Important: This article is for general information only and does not constitute tax or legal advice. Tax rules change — always verify with HMRC or a qualified accountant before making decisions. Published 29 May 2026 for 2026-27.